This is how far…

Once upon a time there was a young man of suspicious background who had an idea…

utopia

He proposed a way to repair the heartache and injustice in the world, a way that would set things right, restore relationships, help the marginalized, rouse the satisfied, strengthen the weak and humble the proud. It made sense… but it was costly for most to actually do it, to actually be that honest and open and compassionate. He decided to show them exactly how far they might have to go and what the cost might really be…

He started with the religious leaders who seemed hyper-focused on guilt, shame, and fear of their “god” and his rules. He said they were missing the point, that all the negativity they zeroed in on only led to more and more negativity and turmoil. He tried to show them the benefits of his way, even helping people who were desperate and in need. This only further angered the powerful religious people, some of whom were quite wealthy. They decided to get the government involved to stop this young man.

The government was happy to let the police beat this young man badly, hoping he would just shut up and go away. But he didn’t – he spoke truths to the governor that were unsettling. They threw him in jail while the governor considered what to do…

Meanwhile the religious leaders gathered a crowd together to demand this young man be punished. They screamed and protested outside the governor’s mansion until the governor finally relented and agreed that they’d had enough of this young man and his idealism. They scheduled his execution for later that day.

The young man didn’t protest. He didn’t plead for his life. He didn’t try to escape, fight back, or anything of the kind. He was saying, “This is how far love will go to help those who need it.” This is how far…

A month and a half later, his students were still hiding out, confused and lacking motivation to move forward. And then it finally hit them – something crystallized in their minds and hearts and they GOT IT. It was right around a national holiday where thousands came to their town to celebrate – the perfect time to keep the message of the young man alive. So they got on their soap boxes and started proclaiming the same ideals the young man had proclaimed… and people in the crowd started to get it, too.

Some of the out-of-towners decided to stick around for a while and learn more about this. Those who ran out of money were taken care of. Those who needed food were fed. Those who were sick received the help they needed. It was an amazing and thrilling time!

Unfortunately, as these things go, people lost the vision. They traded the ideals for peace with the government. They turned the ideals into just another religion, one that would ultimately oppress and shame those who still held to the ideals and practiced them. Sometimes the religious leaders would even invoke and involve the government to help them manage these who remained idealists… but the idealists didn’t care, because they remembered the actions of the young man many years ago that said, “This is how far love will go to help those who need it.” This is how far…

And so the cycle continues.

Advertisements

Love Wins… Really.

A little something I put on my personal blog back in 2013. I think it makes sense to include it here, too.

bob.sky.young

Consider the following excerpts from the Gettysburg Address by Abraham Lincoln:

“We have come to dedicate a portion of that field… It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. The brave men…who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.


If one were to use this text for the opening voice-over of a future NFL Super Bowl at a brand new stadium in some US city, it might appear to make sense…but it would obviously have nothing at all all to do with the purpose of the speech and how the audience at Gettysburg experienced and understood it back in the mid-1800’s. Some would go so far as to say it was a travesty to dare use such a sacred…

View original post 1,007 more words

No Permission Necessary

I try to NOT be that Facebook Warrior who always has to correct other people as though I alone have the truth. Sometimes, however, someone posts something that misses the point and I try to nudge them back onto the highway. If they have questions and would like to converse, I’m happy to do that, but I’m not going to get into insults and accusations and other things that don’t promote peace and harmony. 53701909_2135950376492682_8582747011474784256_n

The image to the right was posted by a friend from the Philippines in response to something another close friend of mine posted… but never said or implied. It led to a fascinating conversation that touched on many topics near and dear to my heart. I thought I’d share it with you. I left his comments unedited, but I realize that English is not his first language and I ignored errors in grammar because communication and extending grace is far more important than grammatical precision. My replies are in italics.

 

Me: Who is saying here that you can earn God’s acceptance? If that’s what you think is being said, you’re very much missing the point.

He: grace is a gift ,but it doesn’t end up there.If we are absolutely save because of grace ,then why Jesus said to Nicodemus,  John, 3:3 – Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Me: OK, let’s run with that analogy… so, what role did you play when you were born the first time? Were you even aware you were born? Could you identify right then what happened to you? The second birth is no different, friend.

He: you are wrong , there is a difference, Read the conversation in John 3. The second birth is spiritual .It is impossible to born in the flesh again

Me: I’ve read that conversation many times… I’m not suggesting the second birth is physical… I’m suggesting that you play no role in it whatsoever and aren’t even aware of when it first happened… you only realize it later. As in Adam all die, so in Christ ALL are made alive. 🙂

I know it goes against what you were taught. It goes against what I was taught among the Baptists. But it actually IS a biblical notion, there actually ARE believers throughout church history who hold this view, and in the end it gives God far more glory than the horror story that he will torture forever those who didn’t come to the right doctrinal understanding in their less than 100 year lifespan. Every knee WILL bow and every tongue WILL confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God our Father

He: are you saying faith alone is enough?

Me: I’m saying God reconciled the world to himself through Jesus. I’m saying it’s ALL of God. The difference is simply those who realize it and those who don’t yet realize it. That’s why the good news is a PROCLAMATION – we proclaim what is already true.

And according to Paul’s letter to the Romans, faith itself is a gift from God… God gives the faith… and faith is not a list of doctrines and teachings, it’s the inner certainty that inspires us to take great risks based on the character of God and God’s never-ending love for us.

He: so you are saying after we realized, our part is finish ? You dont have to do anything ?

Me: let’s again use the first birth analogy: what did you have to do once you were born? Well, you weren’t yet capable of much, so your parents fed you, changed you, clothed you, protected you, and trained you until you could do more and more and more all by yourself. Did you HAVE to do anything? No, there are plenty of people who squander their lives for lack of purpose or vision.

But once we really see the beauty of the kingdom of God (like a precious pearl or a buried treasure), we are moved from within to participate in it. Jesus’ “Sermon on the Mount” becomes our passion – seeing ourselves, those we know, and ultimately the entire world living out the values and principles that Jesus taught so that the world is more and more restored and more and more in harmony and shalom (peace/wholeness).

Jesus is saving/rescuing/delivering/restoring the WHOLE WORLD, and we get to be part of that! It’s an AWESOME privilege and opportunity! Do I “have” to do that? No… but I WANT to 🙂

He: so what is the important commandment to those who know the ministry of Paul .We must remember the last Apostle was Paul, he was sent by Jesus for the Gentiles .And Jesus was sent by God for, Matthew, 15:24 – But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

Me: How about you answer that question? Clearly you have a particular answer in mind, but I don’t yet see how it applies to this conversation.

I will say that the most important commandment for the church, though, doesn’t come from Paul – it comes from Jesus: “Love one another”. That kind of encapsulates everything, and throws away the stuff that really doesn’t matter (like doctrinal distinctions and practices between denominations).

But let me ask you a question as well… other than the fact that my responses probably don’t match what you’ve been taught (and they didn’t match what I was taught growing up either)… do you understand how what I’m saying is faithful to scripture and to the character of God as revealed in the life of Jesus?

I mean, you don’t seem to have any actual rebuttal to what I’ve posted, so is this actually making some sense to you even though the idea might be foreign to you and that foreignness might make you uncomfortable?

He: are you sure our old being can be holy in the sight of God?

Me: you’ll need to define “old being” and “holy” for us to truly communicate about this. I’m not sure if we view these terms the same or not…

He: I think we have different view? I know you read your Bible but your answer doesn’t aligned the scripture

Me: Technically, my answers don’t align with the interpretation of scripture that you’ve been taught. My answers certainly align with scripture, but not in the way you’ve been taught to read it. We were both taught that the good news was about getting into a good afterlife in “heaven” and avoiding a bad one in “hell”. However…

If you read the good news that Jesus proclaimed, it had nothing to do with the afterlife in a “heaven” or “hell”… it was about the Kingdom of God expanding on the earth (sometimes referred to as the Kingdom of Heaven because the Jews had this thing about not saying “God” out of respect). Read Matthew, which is especially titled this way as it was written to Jews… it’s everywhere, but our teachers assumed that kingdom of heaven meant “heaven when you die”, and assumed that “eternal life” meant something that it really doesn’t in the Greek… it means “life of the ages”, or what we would call “the best way to live”.

Our teachers misled us. I think they did it mostly out of ignorance and conditioning at Bible college, not out of malice. But they certainly missed the point of what Jesus taught, and my teachers even dismissed most everything Jesus taught because they thought the only important thing Jesus did for the church was die as a sacrifice.

But did you know that is just one view of the atonement out of seven or eight views? And that this view (Penal Substitutionary Atonement) was created by men 1500 years after Jesus walked the earth? It was NOT the understanding of the early church and of those who actually walked with Jesus. This is worth you studying, because many of us have been misled by good people away from the original mission and perspective of the early church.

If this is too much for you to consider now, I understand. It took me a long time wrestling with this. But it’s a worthy wrestle, like Jacob with the angel. Blessings to you and yours!

He: I have read the Gospel of Matthew about hell and Luke about after life on earth.And the little flock of Jesus were commanded to love one another, the same in the Church of God. But i wonder why the old being according to you can be holy and perfect

That is all my friend i just want to test the spirit if you are born again

Me: I didn’t say that – I asked you to define those terms and you haven’t defined them for me yet so I don’t know if we’re communicating or not. Please define what you mean by “old being” and “holy” and “perfect” and then I’ll try my best to answer your question. So please don’t say “according to you…” when I never said anything – that’s dishonest.

And if you want to test the spirit… Jesus is Lord, not Caesar or any other king or president, to the glory of God our Father. 🙂

He: I understand what you are saying, i know you know it ,very simple born a sinner,that’s it.Im sure you knew holy and perfect. I am not born with English the tongue. Jesus is Lord but God our Father is in heaven. the God of Jesus

Me: I was born a child of God who sins… but those sins do not change my sonship, just like they didn’t change the sonship of the Prodigal son – the Father embraced him and covered his shame and threw a party without requiring ANYTHING from his son – THAT is the gospel.

Holy means “set apart for a special purpose”. It doesn’t mean without error or flaw. My relationship with my wife is “holy” compared to my relationship with other females… my relationship with my wife is special, but it isn’t perfect. Our fine china is set apart for special meals like the Thanksgiving Feast here in America… but it isn’t necessarily flawless.

And Perfect in the Greek really meant something more like “Mature”. Again, it doesn’t mean “without any error” – God knows our frame, that we are made from clay, and any time we “miss the mark” (which is the true definition of “sin”) God understands just like I understand when my kids make a mistake. And I forgive them without beating them up or torturing them in fire or crazy things like that – I just let it go – THAT is what forgiveness is.

BTW, I said “Jesus is Lord!” so you can compare it to 1 Corinthians 12:3. And if you think “Heaven” is a physical location in the universe, you haven’t yet understood what it meant to the people back in the time of Jesus with their ancient cosmology. Heaven, more often than not in scripture, is a euphemism, not a physical location.

He: you are born a child of God who sins? You are wrong, just like i said you read the bible but your word doesn’t align the scripture. First John, 3:9 – Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Me: Commit means “continually practices” – and I don’t continually practice sin. It’s another unfortunate translation that has led people astray and thinking that God requires human perfection from us when God doesn’t. Also, when you pull just a verse like that and don’t read it for what the original author meant the original hearers to understand, you do injustice to scripture. The same author wrote this just a chapter later:

“Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.”

Did you catch that? “Everyone who loves HAS BEEN BORN of God and KNOWS God”. Did you see any conditions placed upon that? No. Just the fact that love evidences our new birth.

We’re all born once without our permission… we just realize it later. Same things goes with the second birth. 🙂

Whatever Name

When I was six years old, I was selected to recite from memory John 14:1-6 on our church’s Saturday night TV show. It was filmed at the local CBS studios and I remember looking over at the monitor constantly as I was reciting the passage and at the very end exclaiming, “Hey dad – I can see myself on TV!!!” It aired with just the “Hey dad -” part.

Like all good Baptist boys, I was taught that when Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh to the Father but by me” (yes, the King James Version), that it meant all other religions are wrong and unless you pray a particular prayer and believe a particular list of things, you’re not getting into Heaven (wherever that is) when you die (whenever that happens). It’s almost as if the implied question the disciples were asking beforehand was, “How do I personally get into Heaven when I die? Is there more than one way?”

Except that’s not what the disciples were asking.

BigBeaver

Context: they just had a Passover meal where Judas left to betray Jesus for some coin (often referred to as The Last Supper) and Jesus is telling them he’s going away (to die) and they should all love each other because that’s how people will recognize them as his followers.

Instead of saying, “Ok, sure, we’ll love each other…” they respond, “Uh… where are you going? How can we know the way to get there?” In other words, they missed the point (as we all often do).

Jesus says essentially, “Don’t worry… keep trusting God and me. I’m not lying… I’ll prepare a place in ‘My Father’s House’ and come get you so we can be reunited.”

You can probably see how people would take that “My Father’s House” as “Heaven” and the reuniting happening after we all die. However…

Jesus used a lot of euphemisms… the people he taught did the same. Out of respect for even the word “God”, they would use the vague term “Heaven”. Jesus talked about the kind of society that could restore the world as the Kingdom of God, Kingdom of Heaven, Life to the full, and even Life of the Ages (eternal life is an unfortunate translation of that and has led people to wrong conclusions).

The phrase My Father’s House could also be rendered the Household of God or the Family of God and are likely just other ways of saying the same thing. It’s a place where things are done the way God wants them done (with love, mercy, grace, kindness, etc), and it’s the very thing Jesus taught his followers to pray for: “May your will be done on Earth (just like it’s done in your presence [using the euphemism Heaven])”.

His follower Thomas didn’t get it and responds, “We don’t know where you’re going? How can we know the way?” He wasn’t asking “Will people who have never heard of you go to Heaven when they die?” It’s obvious he’s not. He’s really only thinking of himself and his fear of moving forward without Jesus being the leader.

Brian McLaren writes of this, “Stretch your imagination and put yourself in the disciples’ situation. Jesus just told you he is going away and you can’t come with him. Then he says you know how to get where he is going. You don’t understand what he’s talking about. You have no idea where he is going, so how can you know the way to get there? Maybe you assume that since he’s going, you need detailed information on how to meet up with him later on. So you want the missing information so you can get yourself to wherever it is you’re supposed to go. But he tells you to trust him, because he will work everything out. He’ll get you to where you need to be. What a far cry from asking about the eternal destiny of people from other religions or periods in history who had no access to belief in Jesus!”

And so the disciples all responded, “Ah! NOW we get it!”

Nope.

Philip, still confused by all of this, says, “Just show us the Father and we’ll be OK.” In other words, you keep talking about this “Father” whom we’ve never seen, and now you say you’re going to see him and someday we’ll get to as well… well, just SHOW us this Father.” He may even have felt like he was calling Jesus’ bluff.

Jesus responds, “If you want to know what the Father is like… LOOK AT ME. Look at how I live and, what I’ve done… look at my character that you’ve seen for several years now…”

And what was Jesus like for those years the disciples walked with him? Was he exclusionary, showing favoritism, condemnation, elitism? No, quite the opposite – he was known for his compassion, healing, acceptance, forgiveness, inclusion, and love the entire time.

So why would anyone think that Jesus would all of a sudden basically say, “Forget all of that crap, now I want you to believe God will reject everyone except those who share your doctrinal viewpoints about me; the rest can just burn and burn forever.” Sorry, but that just does not compute… any teaching built on that kind of schizophrenia, that kind of going against his own character and teachings… it’s just wrong.

A theme woven throughout this entire scene – including the previous and following chapters (13-17) – is the use of the word “know”. It’s all over the place, and it’s referring to that intimate kind of “knowing” a person, not just “knowing about” that person. If you have the time and desire, check it out.

Nobody was asking about people from other religions.

Nobody was asking about going to heaven when they die.

Words often get in the way of reality. Anyone who lives a life of love, sacrifice, humility, mercy, kindness, etc. IS following the way of Jesus. They may put other names on it (like how the same road here in the Detroit area can be called Quarton, Big Beaver, Metropolitan Highway, and still be thought of as “16 Mile”).

I don’t care what name you put on it… if you’re DOING what Jesus taught – whether or not you are aware he taught it – you’re following the way he presented to restore shalom (peace/harmony/wholeness) to this planet. And in that, I rejoice. I would far rather hang with a generous and compassionate Muslim than some angry condemning jerk who claims to be a “Christian” when that person’s actions are nothing at all like Jesus and give Jesus a bad name. I stand by that.

I know amazing Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and Atheists who make the world a better place by how they live. And I know far too many Christians who continue to screw it all up with their bitterness, selfishness, and lack of concern for the planet and for future generations… mainly because of crazy things about the future they’ve been taught that were invented in the last 200 years and that would give the early church fathers fits.

Nobody in that time was asking “How do I get to Heaven when I die?” Nobody thought of the word “salvation” as being about them staying out of Hell. Rather, they hoped for a hero – a “Messiah” – to save (rescue, deliver, heal, restore) their nation from the Roman Empire who had them under its thumb. Reading the scriptures without these historical facts in mind will lead you to conclusions and actions unworthy of Jesus.

Again, it’s not what you “know about”, it’s who you “know”, intimately so. Someone you can actually trust, someone who’s been there and felt the abuse of the system for speaking truth to power. Someone who loved so deeply that he changed lives and got killed for it. Follow THAT way… because it’s the truth, and it’s the only place where real life is found… whatever name you put on it.

Tikun Olam

This is an actual song we used to sing in church when I was a kid:

I’m satisfied with just a cottage below
A little silver and a little gold
But in that city where the ransomed will shine
I want a gold one that’s silver-lined

I’ve got a mansion just over the hilltop
In that bright land where we’ll never grow old
And someday yonder we will never more wander
But walk on streets that are purest gold!

I imagine a different major faith tradition might word it this way:

I’m satisfied with a marriage arranged
A prayer carpet and some pocket change
But when jihad calls and Allah awaits
I’ll wear the bomb vest and blow through the gates.

I’ve got a virgin just over the blue
And not just one, but seventy two
I know they’ll treat me so very nice
Oh endless pleasure in paradise!

I spot many similarities in the two versions above. For example:

  • Both reveal a radical self-interest
  • Both are willing to endure something in order to get what they want
  • Both view a blessed afterlife as a kind of transaction with God
  • Both reveal a dissatisfaction with the way things are now
  • Both show a disinterest in correcting current problems and injustices

In short, they are selfish ways of looking at life and afterlife. I think they also reveal that contentment here is really a lie – they want MORE, they’re just willing to wait for it.

Another major faith tradition does not share this view. As a matter of fact, the phrase given to their life mission is “tikun olam“… which means “repairing the world.”

I’ve heard fundamentalists and evangelicals condemn other Christian faith traditions as believing that one can “work their way to heaven.” They think that the only work necessary is what Jesus did by dying on the cross and paying their “eternal life insurance policy”. They condemn the notion of a transaction with God… yet they betray themselves because they still view the afterlife as a transaction with little regard to repairing the world now. They look at the trade-off of temporary contentment for eternal gain and like the odds. It’s a gamble they’ll take, a transaction they’ll make.

And the kicker is… it doesn’t really cost them ANYTHING to “believe” such things. Especially not in a first-world country.

Yet Jesus talks about the kingdom of heaven as being so valuable that it’s like a priceless pearl… and the one who values it is willing to sell everything just to have the pearl… which means that person is TOTALLY IMPOVERISHED while he or she possesses (or is possessed by) that pearl. This is a COSTLY transaction.

Then when Jesus talks about the values and principles of the kingdom of heaven – this priceless pearl one is impoverished to possess – it includes things like:

  • valuing sacrificial love over possessions
  • valuing patience and humility over anger and violence
  • valuing fidelity and integrity over mere happiness
  • valuing God doing a secret silent work in people instead of manipulating them with guilt, shame, and condemnation
  • valuing private acts of prayer and charity over the spotlight and public admiration

These values are COSTLY. This kingdom will impoverish you at the same time it enriches you.  But this kingdom’s principles are the only hope for a world bent on violent destruction. They are the “inside-out” way to repair the world.

For when we treat others the way we really would like to be treated…

When we are willing to turn the other cheek and suffer more unjust abuse…

When we refuse to objectify and hold in contempt those not like us…

When we truly believe and live like “we are all in this together”…

then hearts change…
then homes change…
workplaces change…
communities change…
states, regions, and nations change.

The world changes.

The word “salvation” in the Jewish and Christian scriptures is so very broad. It is not limited to “getting out of hell” (if hell even exists). It is suggested that a better, broader translation than “salvation” is actually “restoration”. God is interested in restoration…

  • God wants to restore us to the kind of people he intended from start.
  • God wants to restore our relationships with others so we live in harmony, not animosity and suspicion.
  • God wants to restore our relationship with our Creator so that we don’t live in fear, guilt, and shame, but in love and acceptance.
  • God wants to restore our relationship with creation so that we act as the stewards we are intended to be.

In essence, God wants us to work our way to heaven… not in the “Sweet Bye and Bye”, but right here on earth. Earth will be Heaven. Heaven will come to earth. When?

Well… that’s up to us. Are we so short-sighted that we want a quick transaction and to escape to silver-lined mansion (or 6 dozen virgins) and leave the earth in shambles? If so, we don’t intend to pay the price necessary for heaven – our sweat equity as we help repair the world. We just want what we want and are willing to wait a little while to get it. Because in the end it’s all about ME.

And if that is your position… if those are your desires, then call yourself whatever you want… except “one who desires what God wants”. You’re not following Jesus, you’re not entering the costly narrow gate into the kingdom of heaven that restores the earth so that IT is heaven. You’re just a mercenary willing to let the world go to Hell (if it even exists) while you get what you want.

Tomorrow is Easter. For Christians it is the pivot point of human history. It is where the fear of death is put to death. It is where the one who ransomed us from the enemy demonstrates his power over the enemy, which emboldens us to do what we must. And what did his followers do mere weeks afterward? The lived in harmony. They prayed together and shared food and burdens together. They sold possessions they didn’t need to help others who lacked. They affected real change in the real world in real-time. And the impact of that spread throughout the known civilized world… and beyond.

Yes, in time many no longer wanted to pay that cost and turned the mission into a mere religion that cost nothing and promised a good pay-off in the end. But you know – deep in your heart you know – this is not why we were created… we are meant for so much more than this. We are meant for… tikun olam.

The Flaw

What is the rational basis for nations and kingdoms? What gives anyone the right to draw lines on a map and say “This is MINE – and I will KILL YOU if you try to take it from me”?

Yes, I understand the notion of people pooling resources together to provide infrastructure for a civilized society. Though one would think that everyone would see that as a self-interest that is in everyone’s best interest… and one would think that everyone would do their fair share so that those who have less don’t bear a greater percentage of the burden. And one would also think that we don’t need an emperor to dictate these things that should be axiomatic to all people.

Why do we, as the human race, insist that millions of fellow humans don’t have the right to healthy food and clean water? Why do we insist by our very actions that it is totally acceptable that millions of fellow humans simply starve and die, that it’s not our problem? Why do we think it is acceptable to export fizzy drinks around the world, but not the basics of life?

Why do we allow people to set themselves up as rulers and lords over others, and then allow them to deny the basics to “their own people”? Why do we squander the lion’s share of our finances on weapons of war? I ask that because that is what we actually do – take a look at the national budget.

What if everyone in the world actually agreed to live in peace and we all refused to allow anyone to usurp power over us? Certainly there is a realistic need to address those who refuse to live honorably toward their fellow humans… but if no one lacked what they needed, and no one demanded to amass untold riches at the expense of the rest of the human race, it wouldn’t take the majority of the national budget to deal with the rebellious… would it?

The more I consider the lyrics to John Lennon’s song “Imagine”, the more I see the simple wisdom in it. And the more I see just how primitive our thinking still is.

And for all you who will point to a book and say the reason for this is that everyone is essentially evil because your book says so… I say poppycock. Yes… poppycock. Because that’s nicer than the word I want to use.

I think the systems we have selfishly built and viciously protect are a “societal machine” that produces the very results we see all around us. The flaw is in the design itself.

I think it’s time to tear down that machine and design one better suited to healthier results for everyone. I don’t anticipate it will happen anytime soon… but just imagine it, won’t you? Because in the end it takes that kind of vision – the seed of a towering idea, planted deep in the soil of the human heart – to propel us forward to a better future. And isn’t that, in the end, the kingdom of God?

Lost My Faith?

I don’t believe most of what I was taught in the fundamentalist and evangelical circles in which I was raised.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.Lost and Confused Signpost

I don’t believe the Bible is what they told me – the inerrant, infallible, perfect revealed Word of God. The scriptures refer to Jesus, not the scriptures, as The Word of God, and in many other places “a word from God” did not require scripture but some other kind of divine connection.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe in the rapture, tribulation, and literal 1000 year millennial kingdom they passed on to me from the twisted imagination of a 19th Century Plymouth Brethren pseudo-scholar named Darby.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe Moses wrote the Pentateuch or that Genesis is to be taken literally (including the creation account). There are enough other scholarly perspectives that make more sense to me now.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe that the primary reason Jesus died was to bear the wrath of God on my sins (and everyone else’s). If Jesus does what the Father does, then he never acted like that.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe that God chose/elected certain people for his favor and others (if not most) for judgment and destruction. Again, we don’t see that in Jesus (though we do see him inviting anyone who is willing to follow him).

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe the good news (gospel) is a few simple steps I have to do in order to go to heaven when I die and avoid eternal conscious torment in a fiery hell. People have disagreed for millennia on how to interpret those few passages that may (or may not) be about heaven and hell, and Jesus was focused on a kingdom/society/community where shalom is pervasive, not on the afterlife.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I’m unwilling to ascribe with certainty to man-made teachings like the Trinity and the Virgin Birth. Maybe it’s the case, maybe not, but there’s no way anyone will ever be able to prove it.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I can’t blindly support the modern nation-state of Israel as God’s re-gathering of his people who can do no wrong. Israel has always done plenty of wrong, and there were plenty of prophets to tell them so.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe the modern 501c chartered corporation known as a “church” is analogous to 1st century community gatherings of followers of Jesus. God doesn’t need buildings, paid staff, air-conditioning, PowerPoint, rock shows with smoke and lights, and a fill-in-the-blank piece of paper so folks can follow the 3 easy steps of the week.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe it’s my job to try to convert people to a religion or a confession or any other agenda. Salt doesn’t try to win people over, neither does light; they just are what they are and have an impact intrinsically and effortlessly.

That doesn’t mean I’ve lost my faith.

I don’t believe that “faith” is a wish, nor is it a collection of traditions and teachings to which I mentally ascribe. Faith is a confidence (despite physical realities) that emboldens one to take risks based on a higher reality that can’t be proven by scientific means. Faith is it’s own evidence.

So no, I haven’t lost my faith.

Maybe my religion, but definitely not my faith.